Right to Counsel in Abuse Proceeding/Permanent Surrender

Print
Published Date Written by Erik L. Smith

The Appellate Court's decision threatens the meaning of the right to counsel assured under R.C. 2151.352 and negates the need to construe the juvenile rules liberally to achieve justice.6 The Appellate Court's decision establishes the illogical rule that adversity between parties in a pending abuse proceeding disappears with the intervening application of a "non-adversarial" procedure, although that procedure, like the abuse proceeding, contemplates termination of parental rights. The Appellate Court rightly acknowledged termination of parental rights as the "death penalty of family law."7 Yet none of the cases the Appellate Court cited involved a contemporaneous abuse complaint. In fact, in one of the cited decisions, no contractual voluntary surrender of parental rights actually transpired under R.C. 5103.15.8 And even if R.C. 5103.15 does not apply where the children have been adjudicated neglected or dependent, R.C. 2151.352 can theoretically apply to R.C. 5103.15 while an abuse complaint is pending. Thus, no direct precedent exists on this serious issue. Accordingly, the scope and constructive effect of R.C. 2151.352 and juvenile rules 1 and 4 urgently need clarification by this court.

 

The implication of the Appellate Court's decision affects the ability of attorneys in every permanent custody proceeding, and particularly in abuse cases, to give truly effective assistance to parents who desperately need it. This is even more important where, as often in juvenile cases, parents must rely on court-appointed counsel. Accordingly, the public interest is affected if the application of the laws and rules regarding the right to assistance of counsel can be judicially altered to subvert the legislature's and the Supreme Court's intent that the right have uniform application and effect throughout a juvenile court proceeding.

 

The Appellate Court's decision sets a precedent that would take all abuse proceedings out from under the umbrella of the assistance of counsel guarantee simply by one party suggesting a permanent surrender. Right to assistance of counsel means the party having the "guiding hand of counsel at every step of the proceeding against [her]."9 That guiding hand means nothing if one party can amputate it simply by taking the parent aside and showing her another statute. Sewing counsel's hand back on at the consent hearing is no cure. Permanent surrender agreements and permanent custody/abuse proceedings both contemplate termination of parental rights. Discussing permanent surrender then essentially negotiates a settlement of the abuse case. Doing that outside the presence of the parent's counsel is intolerable.

 

 

6 See, Juv.R. 1(B)(1-2).

 

7 Judgment Opinion at ¶ 11.

 

8 In re D.C.H. at ¶16.

 

9 In re Gault (1967), 387 U.S. 1, 36, 87 S.Ct. 1428, 18 L.Ed. 527.

The Ohio Putative Father Registry–the WHAT?

I am a single man. Yet I had been in Ohio for over a year before hearing of the Ohio Putative Father Registry, and then only in a Probate Law class. The professor was covering how a child could be adopted without the birth father's consent. "ORC 3701.061: A man who has sexual intercourse with a woman is on notice that if a child is born as a result and the man is the putative father, the child may be adopted without his consent pursuant to division (B) of section 3107 of the Revised Code." That section required the man sign the Putative Father Registry within thirty days after the birth to get notice of the adoption.

 

Ohio Putative Father Registry: The Basics

Unwed fathers are entitled to notice of petitions to adopt their biological children. Yet many fathers lose this right by not registering timely with the Ohio putative father registry (PFR).1R.C. 3107.062. Because adoptions are probate proceedings, lawyers practicing juvenile, domestic relations, or traditional probate law may not understand how the Ohio PFR applies.  At initial consultations then, attorneys may omit counseling fathers about the registry and refer them to attorneys with more specialized experience. But the strict registration deadline, and often unknown deadline date, demand that the father register immediately. Thus the attorney should consider counseling the client about the PFR and help him register that day before referring him. This article gives the information needed to do that.

Preventing Your Infant Child From Being Adopted Without Your Consent

Summary

Consult an adoption law or family law attorney. Otherwise: An unwed father has no absolute right to veto an adoption. You must take action to preserve your rights. Whether the mother is considering adoption or not, an unwed father should, as soon as possible and preferably before the birth:

Disclaimer: The information on the website is not intended to be a source of solicitation or legal advice, the results obtained in any legal matter discussed in any articles or examples are not typical. The information discussed on this website should not be construed as a certain result will occur in a similar situation, the reader should not rely on the information on this site as the sole source of information to make a legal-hiring decision. The reader should not consider the information on this website to be an invitation for an attorney-client relationship. Readers should not act or decline to act based on the content from this site, and should instead contact an attorney or other appropriate professional. Articles and information on this website may discuss law in multiple jurisdictions, as laws and regulations differ from one jurisdiction to another, it is important to discuss your particular situation with an attorney in the jurisdiction where your legal matter exist. Erik Smith does not represent that he has any particular expertise in any area of law. You may email Erik Smith, but to the extent allowed by law those communications shall not be treated as privileged unless Erik Smith represents you, as such do not send confidential information until you have established a formal attorney-client relationship with him. Where applicable on this website, you are informed that we are an interactive computer service that enables access by multiple users and should not be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider. Where applicable Copyright ©2023 Erik L Smith